![streets and trips 2011 trial version streets and trips 2011 trial version](https://cdn.download.it/gen/bookmyshow-india-windows-10-100x100.png)
Samsung, meanwhile, argued that Apple was trying to hurt competition by targeting it for litigation. What did the companies argue this time around?Īpple argued, as it had in the past, that it took on a lot of work and risk to develop the first iPhone and iPad. A jury in November awarded Apple an additional $290.5 million in damages, bringing the total damages to $930 million. However, US District Court Judge Lucy Koh in March 2013 ordered a new trial to recalculate some of the damages in the case, striking $450.5 million off the original judgment against Samsung. Samsung, which asked for $421 million in its countersuit, didn't get anything. It a warded Apple $1.05 billion in damages, much less than the $2.75 billion sought by the Cupertino, Calif., company. A nine-person jury sided with Apple on a majority of its patent infringement claims against Samsung. Samsung countersued, and the case went to trial in August 2012. The whole spat started when Apple filed suit against Samsung in April 2011, accusing its rival of copying the look and feel of its iPhones and iPads. In Apple's original suit, the company said Samsung "has systematically copied Apple's innovative technology and products, features, and designs, and has deluged markets with infringing devices in an effort to usurp market share from Apple." Judge Lucy Koh ordered for the trial to start March 31.
![streets and trips 2011 trial version streets and trips 2011 trial version](https://cdn.download.it/gen/panda-threads-software-100x100.png)
Samsung then filed counterclaims against Apple. Samsung, meanwhile, argued that Apple's suit was about hurting competition and Android.įor the latest case, Apple filed suit against Samsung on February 8, 2012, accusing it of infringing several patents. Apple argued throughout the trial that its case was about Samsung, not Google, and that Samsung copied Apple out of desperation. It covered everything from the invention of the technology at issue in the case to what damages should total. The trial included about 52 hours of testimony, three hours of opening arguments, and four hours of closings. Samsung patent-infringement case, determining that both companies were guilty in some aspects but not guilty in others. Samsung patent-infringement battle is finally over - well at least until it's appealed.Ī jury on Friday handed back a mixed verdict in the Apple v. Apple and Samsung have battled repeatedly over patents.